nanog mailing list archives
Re: Future of WiMax
From: Bret Clark <bclark () spectraaccess com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 10:00:21 -0400
On 06/17/2010 09:46 AM, Dennis Burgess wrote:
Yeah...that is really the crux of the problem. Every WISP I know would switch over in a heartbeat if the upfront cost was the same as deploying many well know 5.8GHz systems. Battling with interference in the 5.8GHz can be tough at times, at least with the 3.65GHz range there is some control over frequency use, but even so, dealing with frequency use in 5.8GHz is worth it for the cost savings.Lots of my clients (Wireless ISPs) have looked into deploying it, however the costs are well over 20 times the cost of a unlicensed system per access point.
Current thread:
- Future of WiMax Seth Mattinen (Jun 16)
- Re: Future of WiMax Rubens Kuhl (Jun 16)
- RE: Future of WiMax Murphy, Jay, DOH (Jun 16)
- RE: Future of WiMax Dennis Burgess (Jun 17)
- Re: Future of WiMax Bret Clark (Jun 17)
- RE: Future of WiMax Dennis Burgess (Jun 17)
- Re: Future of WiMax Jared Mauch (Jun 17)
- Re: Future of WiMax Rubens Kuhl (Jun 16)
- RE: Future of WiMax Holmes,David A (Jun 17)
- RE: Future of WiMax Akyol, Bora A (Jun 18)
- Re: Future of WiMax joel jaeggli (Jun 18)
- RE: Future of WiMax Akyol, Bora A (Jun 18)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Future of WiMax Gregory Hicks (Jun 16)
- Re: Future of WiMax Curtis Maurand (Jun 16)
- Re: Future of WiMax J Wytt (Jun 30)
- Re: Future of WiMax Curtis Maurand (Jun 16)