nanog mailing list archives
Re: Todd Underwood was a little late
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 15:54:26 -0400
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 3:12 PM, Michael Dillon <wavetossed () googlemail com> wrote:
I don't think we'll have (nor would we have in 2005 even) gotten an ipv7/8/9/10 up and spec'd/coded/wrung-out before ~2 yrs from now either. So, given the cards we have, ipv6 isn't all bad.On this we agree. The problem is not IPv6, it is the failure to deploy IPv6 soon enough. Not enough trained people, not enough testing, not enough bugs shaken out.
ok, that matches pretty much exactly what I see/think. Perhaps the initial wording was just odd :) thanks! -chris
Current thread:
- Re: Todd Underwood was a little late, (continued)
- Re: Todd Underwood was a little late Michael Dillon (Jun 19)
- Re: Todd Underwood was a little late deleskie (Jun 19)
- Re: Todd Underwood was a little late bmanning (Jun 19)
- RE: Todd Underwood was a little late George Bonser (Jun 20)
- Country Level BGP Data Paul Stewart (Jun 28)
- Re: Country Level BGP Data Bill Woodcock (Jun 28)
- Re: Country Level BGP Data Steve Bertrand (Jun 28)
- RE: Todd Underwood was a little late Lee Howard (Jun 21)
- Re: Todd Underwood was a little late Christopher Morrow (Jun 21)
- Re: Todd Underwood was a little late Michael Dillon (Jun 21)
- Re: Todd Underwood was a little late Christopher Morrow (Jun 21)
- Re: Todd Underwood was a little late Michael Dillon (Jun 21)