nanog mailing list archives
Re: IP4 Space
From: Joel Jaeggli <joelja () bogus com>
Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2010 21:57:59 -0800
On 03/04/2010 06:41 PM, Thomas Magill wrote:
I've been on board with rolling out IP6 but the SPs I've talked to are all '...about to start trying to possibly think about extending a beta to a small portion of some customers' or something along those lines. This led me to believe that SPs are way behind on this considering the expected exhaustion of IP4 space.
Note, that no operator on this list or any other has had a request approved but not fulfilled by an RIR due to a lack of numbers to assign. When that happens if not before you can can expect behavioral change to occur. denial anger bargaining depression acceptance decide which step you're on... joel
Current thread:
- Re: IP4 Space, (continued)
- Re: IP4 Space Owen DeLong (Mar 05)
- Re: IP4 Space Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 05)
- Re: IP4 Space Mark Newton (Mar 06)
- Re: IP4 Space Shon Elliott (Mar 06)
- Re: IP4 Space Seth Mattinen (Mar 06)
- Re: IP4 Space Mark Andrews (Mar 06)
- Re: IP4 Space Owen DeLong (Mar 06)
- Re: IP4 Space Andy Davidson (Mar 07)
- Re: IP4 Space Robert Brockway (Mar 08)
- Re: IP4 Space Tony Hoyle (Mar 08)
- Re: IP4 Space Joel Jaeggli (Mar 04)
- Re: IP4 Space Larry Sheldon (Mar 04)
- Re: IP4 Space Owen DeLong (Mar 04)
- Re: IP4 Space Jens Link (Mar 10)
- Re: IP4 Space Andy Koch (Mar 10)
- Re: IP4 Space Jim Burwell (Mar 10)
- Re: IP4 Space Owen DeLong (Mar 10)
- Re: IP4 Space Jim Burwell (Mar 10)
- Re: IP4 Space Lamar Owen (Mar 26)
- Re: IP4 Space Owen DeLong (Mar 26)
- Re: IP4 Space Dave Israel (Mar 26)