nanog mailing list archives
Re: wikileaks unreachable
From: Ken Chase <ken () sizone org>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 20:43:51 -0500
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 10:18:18PM -0500, Andrew Kirch said: >Lets be clear here, I'm not encouraging DDoS, I'm enjoying the >possibility that someone will hopefully put a jacketed hollowpoint in >Assange. Not to promote equine defibrilation, but just so you all feel better - http://www.miamiherald.com/2010/11/28/1947638/no-evidence-that-wikileaks-releases.html summary: no one got hurt, and wikileaks lets the newspapers do the hard work of redacting info that'd hurt individuals directly. There has been no loss of lives. But s/lives/political careers/ is a different matter, and might catalyse hyperbole that some are buying into. OBONTOPIC: wikileaks has another DDOS going (real DDOS not plain DOS, apparently.) /kc -- Ken Chase - ken () heavycomputing ca - +1 416 897 6284 - Toronto CANADA Heavy Computing - Clued bandwidth, colocation and managed linux VPS @151 Front St. W.
Current thread:
- Re: wikileaks unreachable, (continued)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable James Jones (Nov 28)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Joe Provo (Nov 28)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Marshall Eubanks (Nov 28)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Ingo Flaschberger (Nov 28)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Andrew Kirch (Nov 28)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Ken Chase (Nov 28)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable James Jones (Nov 28)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Adrian Chadd (Nov 28)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Andrew Kirch (Nov 28)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Wil Schultz (Nov 28)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Ken Chase (Nov 30)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Stefan Fouant (Nov 28)