nanog mailing list archives
Re: wikileaks unreachable
From: Andrew Kirch <trelane () trelane net>
Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 22:18:18 -0500
On 11/28/2010 6:11 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
I find it distressing when Network Operators are willing to encourage DDoS'ing of a site. Any site. Especially on an operational list, where politics are specifically prohibited. You don't like Wikileaks, that's between you & Julian. A DDoS affects the infrastructure of multiple networks, users, other websites, etc., etc. Most people who read the last sentence thought to themselves that is beyond obvious. It is a shame you do not understand it. Put another way, perhaps you should take your own 230gr.
Lets be clear here, I'm not encouraging DDoS, I'm enjoying the possibility that someone will hopefully put a jacketed hollowpoint in Assange. Andrew
Current thread:
- Re: wikileaks unreachable, (continued)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Zaid Ali (Nov 28)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Mark Hofman (Nov 28)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Andrew Kirch (Nov 28)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 28)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Patrick W. Gilmore (Nov 28)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Jorge Amodio (Nov 28)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable James Jones (Nov 28)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Joe Provo (Nov 28)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Marshall Eubanks (Nov 28)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Ingo Flaschberger (Nov 28)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Andrew Kirch (Nov 28)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Ken Chase (Nov 28)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable James Jones (Nov 28)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Adrian Chadd (Nov 28)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Andrew Kirch (Nov 28)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Wil Schultz (Nov 28)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Ken Chase (Nov 30)