nanog mailing list archives
Re: Failover IPv6 with multiple PA prefixes (Was: IPv6 fc00::/7 - Unique local addresses)
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2010 12:27:44 -0400
oops, I clipped a little too much from the message before replying... On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 5:28 AM, Mark Smith <nanog () 85d5b20a518b8f6864949bd940457dc124746ddc nosense org> wrote:
Permanent connectivity to the global IPv6 Internet, while common, should not be essential to being able to run IPv6, and neither should PI. All you should need to run IPv6 reliably is stable internal addressing. Global connectivity should be optional, and possibly only occasional.
I think there are many cases where a 'disconnected' network will want ipv6, I do NOT believe they should use ULA space except in the most extreme cases. It makes more sense to just get these folks a GUA allocation of their proper size, support their DNS and registry needs. I agree that global connectivity should be optional... I've worked on more than one network that had better never see the light of day, and will most likely need (or already has?) ipv6 deployments in the coming months/years. -chris
Current thread:
- Re: Failover IPv6 with multiple PA prefixes (Was: IPv6 fc00::/7 - Unique local addresses), (continued)
- Re: Failover IPv6 with multiple PA prefixes (Was: IPv6 fc00::/7 - Unique local addresses) Mark Andrews (Nov 03)
- Re: Failover IPv6 with multiple PA prefixes (Was: IPv6 fc00::/7 - Unique local addresses) Christopher Morrow (Nov 03)
- Re: Failover IPv6 with multiple PA prefixes (Was: IPv6 fc00::/7 - Unique local addresses) Owen DeLong (Nov 03)
- Re: Failover IPv6 with multiple PA prefixes (Was: IPv6 fc00::/7 - Unique local addresses) Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 03)
- Verizon off-list contact requested Edward A. Trdina III (Nov 03)
- Re: Verizon off-list contact requested Doug Barton (Nov 03)
- Re: Verizon off-list contact requested Seth Mattinen (Nov 03)
- Re: Failover IPv6 with multiple PA prefixes (Was: IPv6 fc00::/7 - Unique local addresses) Owen DeLong (Nov 03)
- Re: Failover IPv6 with multiple PA prefixes (Was: IPv6 fc00::/7 - Unique local addresses) Christopher Morrow (Nov 03)
- Re: Failover IPv6 with multiple PA prefixes (Was: IPv6 fc00::/7 - Unique local addresses) Owen DeLong (Nov 03)
- Re: Failover IPv6 with multiple PA prefixes (Was: IPv6 fc00::/7 - Unique local addresses) Stephen Sprunk (Nov 01)
- Re: Failover IPv6 with multiple PA prefixes (Was: IPv6 fc00::/7 - Unique local addresses) Karl Auer (Nov 02)
- Re: Failover IPv6 with multiple PA prefixes (Was: IPv6 fc00::/7 - Unique local addresses) Owen DeLong (Nov 02)
- Re: Failover IPv6 with multiple PA prefixes (Was: IPv6 fc00::/7 - Unique local addresses) Karl Auer (Nov 02)
- Re: Failover IPv6 with multiple PA prefixes (Was: IPv6 fc00::/7 - Unique local addresses) Owen DeLong (Nov 03)