nanog mailing list archives
Re: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming
From: William Pitcock <nenolod () systeminplace net>
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 10:13:30 -0600
On Fri, 2010-11-19 at 17:06 +0100, Richard Hartmann wrote:
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 14:14, Scott Morris <swm () emanon com> wrote:If 8 bits is a byte, then 16 bits should be a mouthful.When does it become a meal and, more importantly, do you want to supper (sic) size?
The supersize option offered by e.g. McDonalds is not much larger than the normal meal size in my experience. So I guess, 8 bits = small, 16 bits = meal, 24 bits = supersize or something, but that doesn't fit well with IPv6 since each segment between colons is only 16 bits. We could call the :: part the 'liposection' though. William
Current thread:
- Re: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming, (continued)
- Re: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming Richard Hartmann (Nov 19)
- RE: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming George Bonser (Nov 19)
- Re: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming David Israel (Nov 19)
- Re: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming Richard Hartmann (Nov 19)
- Re: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming Owen DeLong (Nov 19)
- Re: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming Richard Hartmann (Nov 19)
- Re: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming Owen DeLong (Nov 19)
- Re: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming Joel Jaeggli (Nov 19)
- Re: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming Richard Hartmann (Nov 19)
- Re: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming William Pitcock (Nov 19)
- Re: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming Cutler James R (Nov 19)
- Re: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming Scott Morris (Nov 22)
- Re: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming Frank Habicht (Nov 19)