nanog mailing list archives

Re: IPv4 sunset date revised : 2009-02-05


From: Barry Shein <bzs () world std com>
Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2010 12:21:16 -0400


The idea was to observe and measure an (almost) all IPv4 network and
its management/infrastructure costs, namely the one we got, not an
IPv6 one, before the transition starts to muddy the waters
significantly.

   -b

On October 22, 2010 at 18:03 bmanning () vacation karoshi com (bmanning () vacation karoshi com) wrote:
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 01:28:24PM -0400, Barry Shein wrote:

It occurs to me that there is some pressing need to investigate this
all-IPv6 internet -- motivated by the cost of (not) maintaining IPv4
forever.

Right now we can observe essentially an all-IPv4 internet (99%,
whatever.)

-- 
        -Barry Shein


     For this, you need to leave the comfort of NANOG and look
     at the CERNnet network over the past ten years.  They have
     been running a large, all IPv6 network for some time now.


     
http://www.authorstream.com/Presentation/Cannes-19148-IPv6-development-China-Outline-Efforts-CERNET-History-Testbed-1-2-3-4-5-Next-Generation-Inter-in-as-Entertainment-ppt-powerpoint/

     www.cs.princeton.edu/~yiwang/papers/iscc05.pdf

     http://www.cernet2.edu.cn/en/char.htm


--bill

-- 
        -Barry Shein

The World              | bzs () TheWorld com           | http://www.TheWorld.com
Purveyors to the Trade | Voice: 800-THE-WRLD        | Dial-Up: US, PR, Canada
Software Tool & Die    | Public Access Internet     | SINCE 1989     *oo*


Current thread: