nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 Routing table will be bloated?
From: Jeroen Massar <jeroen () unfix org>
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 16:08:15 +0200
On 2010-10-26 15:57, Jack Bates wrote: [..]
Am I missing something, or is this minimalist approach going to cause issues in BGP the same as v4 did?
You are missing the point of making a proper plan which can justify address space for your business for the next years. If done properly, you have successfully justified it and you will never ever have to go back to any of the five years. Now what will cause routing bloat is folks who keep on doing the same methods of "load balancing" and "chunking out of PA" and announcing that in BGP. Oh and then there are of course the various organizations who do not know/understand what RPSL is and who do not understand what filtering and aggregation means... Greets, Jeroen
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 Routing table will be bloated?, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 Routing table will be bloated? Mark Smith (Oct 26)
- Re: IPv6 Routing table will be bloated? Mark Smith (Oct 26)
- Re: IPv6 Routing table will be bloated? Randy Carpenter (Oct 26)
- Re: IPv6 Routing table will be bloated? Franck Martin (Oct 26)
- Re: IPv6 Routing table will be bloated? Randy Carpenter (Oct 26)
- Re: IPv6 Routing table will be bloated? Franck Martin (Oct 26)
- Re: IPv6 Routing table will be bloated? Owen DeLong (Oct 26)
- Re: IPv6 Routing table will be bloated? Franck Martin (Oct 26)
- Re: IPv6 Routing table will be bloated? Matthew Palmer (Oct 26)
- Re: IPv6 Routing table will be bloated? John Curran (Oct 27)
- Re: IPv6 Routing table will be bloated? Jack Bates (Oct 26)
- Re: IPv6 Routing table will be bloated? JORDI PALET MARTINEZ (Oct 26)