Re: New hijacking - Done via via good old-fashioned Identity Theft

[Eric Brunner-Williams <brunner () nic-naa net>]

On 10/6/10 10:34 AM, Owen DeLong wrote:
> On Oct 6, 2010, at 6:35 AM, Ben McGinnes wrote:
>
> > On 7/10/10 12:08 AM, Eric Brunner-Williams wrote:
> > > so ... should domains associated with asn(s) and addr block allocations
> > > be subject to some expiry policy other than "it goes into the drop pool
> > > and one of {enom,pool,...} acquire it (and the associated non-traffic
> > > assets) for any interested party at $50 per /24"?
> >
> > Interesting idea, but how do you apply it to ccTLD domains with widely
> > varying policies.  All it takes is whois records being legitimately
> > updated to use domain contacts using a ccTLD domain to circumvent.
> > Sounds like more of a stop-gap measure.
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> > Ben
>
> Number resources are not and should not be associated with domain
> resources at the policy level. This would make absolutely no sense
> whatsoever.

hmm. ... "are not" ... so the event complained of ... didn't happen?