Re: ARIN Fraud Reporting Form ... Don't waste your time

[bmanning () vacation karoshi com]

On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 11:07:58AM -0700, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
> In message <20101001123356.GA10880 () vacation karoshi com.>, 
> bmanning () vacation karoshi com wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 04:10:12AM -0700, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
> > > No, it's kind of like asking the DMV whether the car belongs to the thief
> > > or to someone else.  They keep the records for Christ's sake!  They *can*
> > > take a position on that rudumentary, simple, and basic question, and they
> > > should.  And that is all I ask or expect them to do.  But they don't
> > > even want to do that miniscule amount of work, apparently.  They want to
> > > be the Keeper of the Records, but then they want to roll over and play
> > > dead, or ignorant, or agnostic, whenever somebody has the temerrity to
> > > simply ask them what the f**king records they are keeping *mean* about
> > > who actually owns what.
> > >
> > > I already said it, but I'll say it again for the benefit of those with
> > > low reading comprehension.  Nobody is asking ARIN to go out, with guns
> > > drawn, and pull the plug themselves.  But they can and should take a
> > > position on who owns what.  That is a judicial function, not a police
> > > function.  If you don't understand the distinction, then you are dumber
> > > than you think I think you are.
>
> > ...
> >
> >     Are you suggesting that ARIN does _NOT_ publish data or that 
> >     ARIN doesn't keep the data current, or something else?
>
> I already said what I meant, twice, and quite clearly, I think.
>
> If you don't get it after two repetitions, then I doubt that me trying
> to rephrase it yet a third time is going to help your comprehension any.
>
>
> Regards,
> rfg

        Ok... thanks for the favor of your reply.

--bill