nanog mailing list archives
RE: Cisco 6509/6513 cable management...
From: Dylan Ebner <dylan.ebner () crlmed com>
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2010 16:01:34 +0000
Justin really hit in on the head with points 4 and 5. You can have the the most organized cabling in the work and lack of labeling and documentation can kill you in a second. A long time ago I was introduced to the rule of 8s. 80% of network outages are caused by cable failure, 80% of the time to repair is finding the cable, and for a mid to large organization, it costs 80K per hour of downtime. We took this to heart and borrowed an idea from Sun. Every cable in our DC has two labels per end. One label for the near end and one for the far. This way you always know where you came from and where you are going. It takes a lot of time to setup, but it is worth every penny, Dylan Ebner, Network Engineer Consulting Radiologists, Ltd. -----Original Message----- From: Justin M. Streiner [mailto:streiner () cluebyfour org] Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2010 8:39 AM To: nanog () nanog org Subject: Re: Cisco 6509/6513 cable management... On Tue, 21 Sep 2010, Positively Optimistic wrote:
Do any of our fellow nanog members have experience with cable management on 6509/6513 cisco switches? We're upgrading infrastructure in some of our facilities,.. and until it came to cable management, the switches seemed to be a great idea... 8 48port blades.. pose a challenge.. or a problem..
The biggest things with 6500s, or any high-density configuration for that matter, are: 1. Using racks/cabinets that have ample space for your vertical and horizontal cabling. If you don't have this, things can get ugly in a hurry. Make sure the kit you choose has plenty of wire management channel space left over even after the racks are fully populated. Having to tear overstuffed wire management channels apart to back-pull a bad cable or jumper at 3 AM is no fun. 2. Emphasizing the importance of following established cabling standards to the people who will be touching this equipment. Having visual aids, i.e. "Here are some pictures of the quality of work we expect", usually go a lot farther to drive this point home than handing someone a 20-page cabling standards document with no pictures. 3. Dont forget about your inter-rack/overhead wiring channels/trays. I've seen a few places that had things neatly dressed in the racks, but the overhead channels were a complete mess... assumingly because they were hidden from view :). If your overhead distribution has separate channels/lanes for power/copper/fiber, even better. 4. Labeling and documentation. 5. See 4. jms
Current thread:
- Cisco 6509/6513 cable management... Positively Optimistic (Sep 20)
- Re: Cisco 6509/6513 cable management... Nick Hilliard (Sep 21)
- Re: Cisco 6509/6513 cable management... Matthew Topper (Sep 21)
- Re: Cisco 6509/6513 cable management... Seth Mattinen (Sep 21)
- Re: Cisco 6509/6513 cable management... Justin M. Streiner (Sep 21)
- Re: Cisco 6509/6513 cable management... Matthew Topper (Sep 21)
- Re: Cisco 6509/6513 cable management... William Herrin (Sep 21)
- Re: Cisco 6509/6513 cable management... Seth Mattinen (Sep 21)
- Re: Cisco 6509/6513 cable management... Justin M. Streiner (Sep 21)
- RE: Cisco 6509/6513 cable management... Dylan Ebner (Sep 21)
- Re: Cisco 6509/6513 cable management... Brandon Applegate (Sep 21)
- Re: Cisco 6509/6513 cable management... Chuck Anderson (Sep 21)
- RE: Cisco 6509/6513 cable management... Tony Thornton (Sep 21)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Cisco 6509/6513 cable management... Dantzig, Brian (Sep 21)
- Re: Cisco 6509/6513 cable management... Jeff Wasilko (Sep 21)
- Re: Cisco 6509/6513 cable management... Matthew Schlegel (Sep 22)
- Re: Cisco 6509/6513 cable management... Jeff Wasilko (Sep 21)
- Re: Cisco 6509/6513 cable management... Nick Hilliard (Sep 21)