nanog mailing list archives
Re: Cisco 6509/6513 cable management...
From: Matthew Schlegel <nite97m () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 09:03:23 -0500
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 15:16, Jeff Wasilko <jeffw () smoe org> wrote:
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 02:53:58PM -0500, Dantzig, Brian wrote:On Tue, 21 Sep 2010, Positively Optimistic wrote:Let me 2nd the mighty mo! We went with them, and had our cabling contractor pre-wire the switch faces to patch panels. They're really nice--probably the nicest rack system I've worked with.
I'll give a hearty second to prewired patch panels. Even with the best cable management systems, patching directly into the switch is likely to eventually get messy. At least with the patch panels, even if cabling there gets messy for any reason, the front of the switches stay nice and clean, which makes a huge difference if you ever have a line card swap.
Current thread:
- Re: Cisco 6509/6513 cable management..., (continued)
- Re: Cisco 6509/6513 cable management... Justin M. Streiner (Sep 21)
- Re: Cisco 6509/6513 cable management... William Herrin (Sep 21)
- Re: Cisco 6509/6513 cable management... Seth Mattinen (Sep 21)
- Re: Cisco 6509/6513 cable management... Justin M. Streiner (Sep 21)
- RE: Cisco 6509/6513 cable management... Dylan Ebner (Sep 21)
- Re: Cisco 6509/6513 cable management... Brandon Applegate (Sep 21)
- Re: Cisco 6509/6513 cable management... Chuck Anderson (Sep 21)
- RE: Cisco 6509/6513 cable management... Tony Thornton (Sep 21)
- Cisco 6509/6513 cable management... Dantzig, Brian (Sep 21)
- Re: Cisco 6509/6513 cable management... Jeff Wasilko (Sep 21)
- Re: Cisco 6509/6513 cable management... Matthew Schlegel (Sep 22)
- Re: Cisco 6509/6513 cable management... Jeff Wasilko (Sep 21)