nanog mailing list archives
Re: Software-based Border Router
From: khatfield () socllc net
Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 22:12:11 +0000
I do agree here. If you are not moving a lot of data then something like BSD or Vyatta may be a good alternative. You do still have possible reboots required and things you would not see as often with a hardware-appliance model. However, for cheaper than the cost of 1 appliance you could build in redundancy. I guess the question is how many PPS you plan to push, whether you have regularly scheduled maintenance windows that you could bring it down for a reboot, and whether the additional maintenance involved still keeps you in the black? I am a big proponent of open source every thing. Although, I am a bigger proponent of stability and less maintenance. If you could prove out a software-based solution against the cost of a hardware solution then I don't see any reason not to go that route. -----Original Message----- From: Fletcher Kittredge <fkittred () staff gwi net> Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 17:21:57 To: William Herrin<bill () herrin us> Cc: <nanog () nanog org> Subject: Re: Software-based Border Router Another big problem for Linux/Unix-based routers of this size/cost is upgrade-ability. If you need to add cards, you are going to have to bring the router down for extended periods. Likewise, a software upgrade can be a bigger deal than on a purpose designed router. If a router is mission critical, Linux/Unixed-based has issues over extended periods. regards, Fletcher On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 4:35 PM, William Herrin <bill () herrin us> wrote:
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 6:15 AM, Nathanael C. Cariaga <nccariaga () stluke com ph> wrote:Thank you for the prompt response. Just to clarify my previous post, I was actually referring to Linux/Unix-based routers. We've been considering this solution because presently we don't have any budget for equipment acquisition this year.What's your time worth? Quagga on Linux is a fine software, but messing with the idiosyncrasies is far more time consuming than buying a Cisco 2811, adding enough RAM to handle BGP, configuring it once and forgetting about it. Also bear in mind that while your ISP's engineers can help you configure your Cisco router, Quagga is a mystery to them. You can still get help... but not from someone who also knows how the ISP's network is configured. This is not a problem if you have lots of experience with BGP routing. Do you? Regards, Bill Herrin -- William D. Herrin ................ herrin () dirtside com bill () herrin us 3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/> Falls Church, VA 22042-3004
-- Fletcher Kittredge GWI 8 Pomerleau Street Biddeford, ME 04005-9457 207-602-1134
Current thread:
- Software-based Border Router Nathanael C. Cariaga (Sep 26)
- Re: Software-based Border Router sthaug (Sep 26)
- Re: Software-based Border Router Nathanael C. Cariaga (Sep 26)
- RE: Software-based Border Router Dennis Burgess (Sep 26)
- Re: Software-based Border Router William Herrin (Sep 26)
- Re: Software-based Border Router Fletcher Kittredge (Sep 26)
- Re: Software-based Border Router Ingo Flaschberger (Sep 26)
- Re: Software-based Border Router khatfield (Sep 26)
- Re: Software-based Border Router cmaurand (Sep 27)
- Re: Software-based Border Router Heath Jones (Sep 27)
- Re: Software-based Border Router Heath Jones (Sep 27)
- Re: Software-based Border Router Curtis Maurand (Sep 28)
- RE: Software-based Border Router Nathan Eisenberg (Sep 28)
- Re: Software-based Border Router Heath Jones (Sep 28)
- RE: Software-based Border Router Nathan Eisenberg (Sep 28)
- Re: Software-based Border Router Curtis Maurand (Sep 29)
- Re: Software-based Border Router Heath Jones (Sep 29)
- Re: Software-based Border Router Curtis Maurand (Sep 29)
- Re: Software-based Border Router Nathanael C. Cariaga (Sep 26)
- Re: Software-based Border Router sthaug (Sep 26)