nanog mailing list archives
Re: v6 Avian Carriers?
From: Jeroen van Aart <jeroen () mompl net>
Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2011 12:23:12 -0700
Sachs, Marcus Hans (Marc) wrote:
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6214/
That RFC is the opposite of funny (to me). Just because rfc1149 is funny that doesn't mean that repetitions of it are funny too. Quite the contrary.
Greetings, Jeroen -- http://goldmark.org/jeff/stupid-disclaimers/ http://linuxmafia.com/~rick/faq/plural-of-virus.html
Current thread:
- Re: v6 Avian Carriers?, (continued)
- Re: v6 Avian Carriers? Scott Morris (Apr 01)
- Re: v6 Avian Carriers? Steven Bellovin (Apr 01)
- Re: v6 Avian Carriers? Antonio Querubin (Apr 01)
- Re: v6 Avian Carriers? Owen DeLong (Apr 01)
- Re: v6 Avian Carriers? Chad Dailey (Apr 01)
- Re: v6 Avian Carriers? Owen DeLong (Apr 01)
- Re: v6 Avian Carriers? Steven Bellovin (Apr 01)
- Re: v6 Avian Carriers? Jay Ashworth (Apr 03)
- Re: v6 Avian Carriers? Robert Bonomi (Apr 01)
- Re: v6 Avian Carriers? Scott Morris (Apr 01)
- Re: v6 Avian Carriers? Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 07)
- Re: v6 Avian Carriers? Scott Brim (Apr 07)
- Re: v6 Avian Carriers? Leo Bicknell (Apr 07)
- Re: v6 Avian Carriers? Jay Ashworth (Apr 07)
- Re: Re: v6 Avian Carriers? Dorn Hetzel (Apr 01)
- Re: Re: v6 Avian Carriers? Justin M. Streiner (Apr 01)
- Re: Re: v6 Avian Carriers? Dorn Hetzel (Apr 01)