Re: v6 Avian Carriers?

[Scott Morris <swm () emanon com>]

Isn't that what the uvula is for?

Oh...   never mind....   wrong swallow.   ;)

On 4/2/11 3:34 AM, Chad Dailey wrote:
> Swallows have MTU issues.
>
> On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 8:27 PM, Owen DeLong <owen () delong com> wrote:
>
> > On Apr 1, 2011, at 10:45 AM, Steven Bellovin wrote:
> >
> > > On Apr 1, 2011, at 8:41 11AM, Sachs, Marcus Hans (Marc) wrote:
> > >
> > > > I was wondering which April 1st this would happen on.   Now I know.  So
> > if a v6 carrier swallows a v4 datagram does that count as packet loss or
> > tunneling?
> > > > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6214/
> > > I was disappointed in this RFC -- Section 3.1 didn't include the proper
> > discussion of the difference between African and European avian carriers,
> > and we know what happens if that question is asked at the wrong time.
> > >               --Steve Bellovin, https://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb
> > That applies to swallows. I'm not sure pidgeons pose the same issue. I
> > think in general, swallows
> > provide poor platforms for avian transport of IP datagrams.
> >
> >
> > Owen