Re: OSPF vs IS-IS

[Joel Jaeggli <joelja () bogus com>]

On Aug 11, 2011, at 3:19 PM, Randy Bush wrote:

> > The only reason in my opinion to run IS-IS rather than OSPF today is
> > due to the fact that IS-IS is decoupled from IP making it less
> > vulnerable to attacks.
>
> how about simpler and more stable?

not rooted to a particular area.

supports more than one AFI at the same time

isn't dependent on ip addressing to form an adjacency

etc

> randy