nanog mailing list archives
Re: OSPF vs IS-IS
From: Tom Hill <tom () ninjabadger net>
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 13:41:45 +0100
On Fri, 2011-08-12 at 08:23 -0400, CJ wrote:
So, IS-IS being preferred...realistically, what is the learning curve?
Low, IMO. If you know EIGRP/OSPF, you'll have no trouble picking-up IS-IS. Took me a few hours in a Cisco lab @ Uni to have it all worked-out (interestingly that was about all the CCNP labs covered at the time!) Of course, knowing how the protocol works at a level suitable for implementation in a critical network takes a bit longer, but you shouldn't have any issue bootstrapping your test networks for that purpose. Tom
Current thread:
- Re: OSPF vs IS-IS, (continued)
- Re: OSPF vs IS-IS CJ (Aug 11)
- Re: OSPF vs IS-IS Jeffrey S. Young (Aug 12)
- Re: OSPF vs IS-IS jim deleskie (Aug 12)
- Re: OSPF vs IS-IS CJ (Aug 12)
- Re: OSPF vs IS-IS James Jones (Aug 12)
- Re: OSPF vs IS-IS Stefan Fouant (Aug 12)
- Re: OSPF vs IS-IS Jeffrey S. Young (Aug 13)
- Re: OSPF vs IS-IS Randy Bush (Aug 13)
- Re: OSPF vs IS-IS Jeffrey S. Young (Aug 13)
- Re: OSPF vs IS-IS Saku Ytti (Aug 13)
- Re: OSPF vs IS-IS Tom Hill (Aug 12)
- Re: OSPF vs IS-IS Scott Morris (Aug 12)
- Re: OSPF vs IS-IS Scott Morris (Aug 12)
- RE: OSPF vs IS-IS Doug Marschke (Aug 16)
- Re: OSPF vs IS-IS Jeff Wheeler (Aug 12)
- Re: OSPF vs IS-IS Douglas Otis (Aug 12)
- Re: OSPF vs IS-IS Stefan Fouant (Aug 11)
- Re: OSPF vs IS-IS Jimmy Hess (Aug 11)
- Re: OSPF vs IS-IS Stefan Fouant (Aug 11)