nanog mailing list archives
Re: Juniper <-> Cisco IPv6 BGP peering
From: Jen Linkova <furry13 () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2011 23:57:39 +1100
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 8:54 AM, Randy Carpenter <rcarpen () network1 net> wrote:
When I am trying to peer to one of my upstreams (who has cisco) with my Juniper SRX, They are seeing the link-local address as the next-hop, but are unable to get an ND entry for it, and thus cannot forward traffic to me.
on second thought - why are they using link-local as the next-hop in the first place if the eBGP session is established over GUA? -- SY, Jen Linkova aka Furry
Current thread:
- Re: Juniper <-> Cisco IPv6 BGP peering, (continued)
- Re: Juniper <-> Cisco IPv6 BGP peering Leo Bicknell (Dec 07)
- Re: Juniper <-> Cisco IPv6 BGP peering Peter Rubenstein (Dec 07)
- Re: Juniper <-> Cisco IPv6 BGP peering Randy Carpenter (Dec 07)
- Re: Juniper <-> Cisco IPv6 BGP peering Justin M. Streiner (Dec 07)
- Re: Juniper <-> Cisco IPv6 BGP peering Jack Bates (Dec 07)
- Re: Juniper <-> Cisco IPv6 BGP peering Vicky Shrestha (Dec 07)
- Re: Juniper <-> Cisco IPv6 BGP peering Jen Linkova (Dec 08)
- Re: Juniper <-> Cisco IPv6 BGP peering Randy Carpenter (Dec 09)
- Re: Juniper <-> Cisco IPv6 BGP peering Daniel Roesen (Dec 09)
- Re: Juniper <-> Cisco IPv6 BGP peering Jen Linkova (Dec 09)
- Re: Juniper <-> Cisco IPv6 BGP peering Randy Carpenter (Dec 07)
- Re: Juniper <-> Cisco IPv6 BGP peering Mark Tinka (Dec 09)