nanog mailing list archives
Re: De-bogon not possible via arin policy.
From: Andrew D Kirch <trelane () trelane net>
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 16:28:29 -0500
On 12/14/2011 4:20 PM, Rubens Kuhl wrote:
His users can also switch to DECNET and reach about as many internet sites as they would with IPv6. Ooh well, internet's dieing, lets pack up our routers and go home. Randy Bush will turn out the lights for us.You should easily qualify for a /32 or larger IPv6 block. And it's curious that errors that are likely to be there for decades are just now trying to be fixed as IPv4 pool is depleted, isn't it ?
Andrew
Current thread:
- De-bogon not possible via arin policy. Cameron Byrne (Dec 14)
- Re: De-bogon not possible via arin policy. Rubens Kuhl (Dec 14)
- Re: De-bogon not possible via arin policy. Andrew D Kirch (Dec 14)
- Re: De-bogon not possible via arin policy. Robert E. Seastrom (Dec 14)
- Re: De-bogon not possible via arin policy. David Conrad (Dec 14)
- Re: De-bogon not possible via arin policy. Jeff Wheeler (Dec 14)
- Re: De-bogon not possible via arin policy. Jimmy Hess (Dec 14)
- Re: De-bogon not possible via arin policy. Joel jaeggli (Dec 14)
- Re: De-bogon not possible via arin policy. David Conrad (Dec 14)
- Re: De-bogon not possible via arin policy. Jimmy Hess (Dec 14)
- Re: De-bogon not possible via arin policy. Jared Mauch (Dec 14)
- Re: De-bogon not possible via arin policy. Matthew Kaufman (Dec 15)
- Re: De-bogon not possible via arin policy. Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 15)
- Re: De-bogon not possible via arin policy. Rubens Kuhl (Dec 14)