nanog mailing list archives
RE: next-best-transport! down with ethernet!
From: "Holmes,David A" <dholmes () mwdh2o com>
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2011 12:06:51 -0800
If I am not mistaken the IETF efforts to standardize the TRILL spec, and IEEE efforts to standardize the DCB spec will provide the desired features to Ethernet: lossless delivery, QoS, and bringing an IS-IS layer 3 model to layer 2. I think Cisco has a pre TRILL/DCB standards feature set called Fabricpath, and Brocade has a feature set called VCS. Both, I think, will converge Ethernet data and Fibre Channel over the same wire. -----Original Message----- From: Tom Hill [mailto:tom () ninjabadger net] Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2011 11:58 AM To: nanog () nanog org Subject: Re: next-best-transport! down with ethernet! On Thu, 2011-12-29 at 10:06 -0500, Christopher Morrow wrote:
yes, let's get something with say fixed sized packets, ability to have predictable jitter and also, for fun, no more STP! Ethernet is too complex, maybe something simpler? I hear there's this new tech 'ATM'? it seems to fit the bill!
Pfft. Everyone knows that Fibre Channel's going to replace everything... The minute we get those 128Gbit/sec transmission characteristics, Ethernet's gonna be as good as RS-485. This communication, together with any attachments or embedded links, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain information that is confidential or legally protected. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, disclosure, copying, dissemination, distribution or use of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail message and delete the original and all copies of the communication, along with any attachments or embedded links, from your system.
Current thread:
- next-best-transport! down with ethernet! Christopher Morrow (Dec 29)
- Re: next-best-transport! down with ethernet! Tom Hill (Dec 29)
- RE: next-best-transport! down with ethernet! Holmes,David A (Dec 29)
- RE: next-best-transport! down with ethernet! Vitkovsky, Adam (Dec 30)
- Re: next-best-transport! down with ethernet! Tei (Dec 30)
- Re: next-best-transport! down with ethernet! Ray Soucy (Dec 30)
- RE: next-best-transport! down with ethernet! Vitkovsky, Adam (Dec 30)
- Re: next-best-transport! down with ethernet! Ray Soucy (Dec 30)
- Re: next-best-transport! down with ethernet! Aiden Sullivan (Dec 30)
- RE: next-best-transport! down with ethernet! Vitkovsky, Adam (Dec 30)
- Re: next-best-transport! down with ethernet! Jay Ashworth (Dec 30)
- RE: next-best-transport! down with ethernet! Vadim Antonov (Dec 30)
- Re: next-best-transport! down with ethernet! Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 30)
- Re: next-best-transport! down with ethernet! Tom Hill (Dec 29)