nanog mailing list archives

Re: IPv6 mistakes, was: Re: Looking for an IPv6 naysayer...


From: Mark Andrews <marka () isc org>
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 12:18:41 +1100


In message <1DBDCA5F-16EC-428D-BC46-3BD59A6F4CDB () delong com>, Owen DeLong write
s:

You can reflash CPE devices to support this that you can't reflash
to support IPv6 as there is no space in the flash for the extra
code.  This should be minimal.  A extra PPP/DHCP option and a check
box to enable (default) / disable setting it.

Reflashing most CPE amounts to forklifting. The difference between
having them bring their CPE in to be reflashed or rolling a truck
to do same vs. replacing the CPE will, in most cases, actually render
replacing the CPE cheaper.

It depends on the CPE device.  Lots of CPE devices can be re-flashed
in place.  It just requires the will to make the images available.

It can be deployed incrementally.

So can replacing the CPE, but, neither is a particularly attractive
alternative for many providers.

And further indecision is going to make this worse not better.

Owen

-- 
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: marka () isc org


Current thread: