nanog mailing list archives
RE: SFP vs. SFP+
From: "Peter Nowak" <pnowak () batblue com>
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 00:55:45 -0500
You can plug SFP module (copper or fiber) into any SFP+ port. So, on 10G port you can run either 1GE or 10GE. Peter Nowak _____ From: Frank Bulk [mailto:frnkblk () iname com] To: 'Richard A Steenbergen' [mailto:ras () e-gerbil net] Cc: nanog () nanog org Sent: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 22:04:29 -0500 Subject: RE: SFP vs. SFP+ Are there are any optics that plug into 10G ports but have a copper or optical 1G interface? There's some equipment that I'm specing where it is $10K for a multi-port 1G card, even while I really may only *occasionally* need a single 1G port and there's a free 10G port for me to use. Frank -----Original Message----- From: Richard A Steenbergen [mailto:ras () e-gerbil net] Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2011 7:00 PM To: Jason Lixfeld Cc: nanog () nanog org Subject: Re: SFP vs. SFP+ On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 03:41:28PM -0800, Sam Chesluk wrote: > Depends on the switch. Some, like the 2960S and 4948E, have 1G/10G > ports. They will, however, not operate at 4Gbps (that particular speed > was chosen to allow the core components to work for gigabit Ethernet, > OC48, 2G FC, and 4G FC). 4G SFPs are relatively rare, and only for fibre channel. Multi-rate SFPs that do up to 2.5G (for OC48) are a lot more common, but they cost more than just a simple 1GE SFP. Since all you can do with Ethernet is 1G or 10G anyways, "most" SFPs you'll encounter in the field will be the cheaper non-multirate kind. For more information about SFP+, as well as some comparisons between different 10G optic types, take a look at: http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog42/presentations/pluggables.pdf As an update (since this presentation is from Feb 2008), SFP+ is just now finally starting to get into 40km/ER reach territory. Supplies are limited, as they just very recently started shipping, but they do exist. Of course since they moved the electronic dispersion compensation (EDC) off the optic and onto the host board, the exact distances you'll be able to achieve are still based on the quality of the device you're plugging them into. SFP+ is still mostly an enterprise box or high density / short reach offering, and XFP is still required for full functionality. -- Richard A Steenbergen <ras () e-gerbil net> http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
Current thread:
- SFP vs. SFP+ Jason Lixfeld (Feb 17)
- RE: SFP vs. SFP+ Sam Chesluk (Feb 17)
- Re: SFP vs. SFP+ Jimmy Changa (Feb 17)
- RE: SFP vs. SFP+ Sam Chesluk (Feb 17)
- Re: SFP vs. SFP+ Richard A Steenbergen (Feb 17)
- RE: SFP vs. SFP+ Frank Bulk (Feb 17)
- Re: SFP vs. SFP+ Richard A Steenbergen (Feb 17)
- RE: SFP vs. SFP+ Peter Nowak (Feb 17)
- Re: SFP vs. SFP+ Richard A Steenbergen (Feb 17)
- Re: SFP vs. SFP+ Nick Hilliard (Feb 18)
- Re: SFP vs. SFP+ Vincent Hoffman (Feb 18)
- Re: SFP vs. SFP+ Vincent Hoffman (Feb 18)
- Re: SFP vs. SFP+ Jimmy Changa (Feb 17)
- RE: SFP vs. SFP+ Sam Chesluk (Feb 17)