nanog mailing list archives

Re: [arin-ppml] NAT444 rumors (was Re: Looking for an IPv6 naysayer...)

From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch () muada com>
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 12:04:57 +0100

On 18 feb 2011, at 9:24, Zed Usser wrote:

Basic Internet services will work (web browsing, email, Facebook, Youtube,...), but:
- Less torrenting
- Less Netflix watching
- Less FTP downloads
- Less video streaming in general (webcams, etc.)


You forget:

- no IPv6 tunnels

Deploying NAT444 without IPv6 is a very bad thing.

Current thread:

Re: [arin-ppml] NAT444 rumors (was Re: Looking for an IPv6 naysayer...) Zed Usser (Feb 18)
- Re: [arin-ppml] NAT444 rumors (was Re: Looking for an IPv6 naysayer...) Iljitsch van Beijnum (Feb 18)
- Re: [arin-ppml] NAT444 rumors (was Re: Looking for an IPv6 naysayer...) Andrew Yourtchenko (Feb 18)
  - Re: [arin-ppml] NAT444 rumors (was Re: Looking for an IPv6 naysayer...) Owen DeLong (Feb 18)
- Re: [arin-ppml] NAT444 rumors (was Re: Looking for an IPv6 naysayer...) Owen DeLong (Feb 18)
  - Re: [arin-ppml] NAT444 rumors (was Re: Looking for an IPv6 naysayer...) Zed Usser (Feb 18)
    - Re: [arin-ppml] NAT444 rumors (was Re: Looking for an IPv6 naysayer...) Owen DeLong (Feb 18)
    - Re: [arin-ppml] NAT444 rumors (was Re: Looking for an IPv6 naysayer...) Zed Usser (Feb 18)
    - Re: [arin-ppml] NAT444 rumors (was Re: Looking for an IPv6 naysayer...) Owen DeLong (Feb 18)
    - Re: [arin-ppml] NAT444 rumors (was Re: Looking for an IPv6 naysayer...) Zed Usser (Feb 19)
    - Re: [arin-ppml] NAT444 rumors (was Re: Looking for an IPv6 naysayer...) Owen DeLong (Feb 19)
    - Re: [arin-ppml] NAT444 rumors (was Re: Looking for an IPv6 naysayer...) Zed Usser (Feb 19)

(Thread continues...)