nanog mailing list archives
Re: quietly....
From: John Curran <jcurran () arin net>
Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 04:19:50 +0000
On Feb 1, 2011, at 11:05 PM, George Herbert wrote:
More interesting would be re-requests - organizations exhausting an initial allocation and requiring more. People asking for the first one just indicates initial adoption rates. Other than experimental blocks, I am generally under the impression that IPv6 allocations are designed to avoid that being necessary for an extended period of time. If that is not true, then that's a flag.
I don't believe we've had an IPv6 "additional" request yet (but I look forward to it happening at some point :-). I will check and get back to the list with the definitive answer. /John John Curran President and CEO ARIN
Current thread:
- Re: quietly...., (continued)
- Re: quietly.... Martin Millnert (Feb 01)
- Re: quietly.... Paul Graydon (Feb 01)
- RE: quietly.... Lee Howard (Feb 01)
- Re: quietly.... Randy Bush (Feb 01)
- Re: quietly.... Owen DeLong (Feb 01)
- Re: quietly.... Paul Graydon (Feb 01)
- Re: quietly.... Kevin Stange (Feb 01)
- Re: quietly.... John Curran (Feb 01)
- Re: quietly.... Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 01)
- Re: quietly.... George Herbert (Feb 01)
- Re: quietly.... John Curran (Feb 01)
- Re: quietly.... Jack Bates (Feb 01)
- Re: quietly.... John Curran (Feb 02)
- Re: quietly.... Skeeve Stevens (Feb 01)
- Re: quietly.... Christopher Morrow (Feb 01)
- Re: quietly.... Owen DeLong (Feb 02)
- Re: quietly.... John Curran (Feb 01)
- Re: quietly.... Geoff Huston (Feb 02)
- Re: quietly.... Matthew Petach (Feb 02)
- Re: quietly.... Rene Wilhelm (Feb 02)
- Re: quietly.... Geoff Huston (Feb 01)