nanog mailing list archives
Re: quietly....
From: Dave CROCKER <dhc2 () dcrocker net>
Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2011 19:32:27 -0800
On 2/19/2011 10:11 AM, kmedcalf () dessus com wrote:
And that has nothing to do with whether a protocol is a peer protocol or not. IP is a peer-to-peer protocol. As SMTP is implemented over IP, it is also a peer-to-peer protocol.
At each layer of an architecture, the question of whether a mechanism is peer to peer can be newly defined. Even within a layer it can be, depending upon configuration choices. IP is typically /not/ peer to peer, since getting from the originating host to the target host is typically mediated by many routers. That is the essence of /not/ being peer to peer. One layer up, we find that TCP typically /is/ peer-to-peer. "SMTP" as a one-hop email transmission protocol is peer-to-peer from the SMTP client to the corresponding SMTP server. However email exchange from an author's MUA to a recipient's MUA is, again, the essence of /not/ being peer to peer. It is typically massively mediated by lots of different email servers.One could configure two MUAs to talk with each other 'directly' using SMTP, but that's never done.
Instant message services similarly are not peer-to-peer technical terms. d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net
Current thread:
- Re: quietly...., (continued)
- Re: quietly.... Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... Jay Ashworth (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... Lamar Owen (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... Mark Andrews (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... Jay Ashworth (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... Mark Andrews (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... Jack Bates (Feb 03)
- RE: quietly.... kmedcalf () dessus com (Feb 19)
- Re: quietly.... Dave CROCKER (Feb 19)
- Re: quietly.... Owen DeLong (Feb 19)
- Re: quietly.... Dave CROCKER (Feb 19)
- Re: quietly.... Lamar Owen (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... Lamar Owen (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... Jay Ashworth (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... Jay Ashworth (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... Scott Helms (Feb 03)
- RE: quietly.... Matthew Huff (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... Jay Ashworth (Feb 03)