nanog mailing list archives
RE: quietly....
From: Matthew Huff <mhuff () ox com>
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 17:28:09 -0500
Seems there's a lot of engineers out there that only want to make sure last year's protocols work, and are willing to totally ignore next year's.
It really is a different universe for University/ISP versus corporate networks. Neither is wrong or right, but both have different needs. My complaint is that my sense is that Ipv6 was designed and favors the ISP environment rather than corporate networks. A corporate network really does want to ignore next year's new hot protocol unless it makes business sense to support it. There may be regulatory reasons to block it (we are required to archive all email and instant messages) or management may decide it's a waste of time to support or management may feel it's a waste of people's work time to use. Obviously as a end-user with residential FTTH, I want something completely different from my ISP.
Current thread:
- Re: quietly...., (continued)
- Re: quietly.... Owen DeLong (Feb 19)
- Re: quietly.... Dave CROCKER (Feb 19)
- Re: quietly.... Lamar Owen (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... Lamar Owen (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... Jay Ashworth (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... Jay Ashworth (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... Scott Helms (Feb 03)
- RE: quietly.... Matthew Huff (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... Jay Ashworth (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... Joe Greco (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... Jack Bates (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... Mark Andrews (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... Jack Bates (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... Mark Andrews (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... Jack Bates (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... Mark Andrews (Feb 03)
- RE: quietly.... Matthew Huff (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... david raistrick (Feb 03)