nanog mailing list archives
Re: Post-Exhaustion-phase "punishment" for early adopters
From: Jay Ashworth <jra () baylink com>
Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 21:35:13 -0500 (EST)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jimmy Hess" <mysidia () gmail com>
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 4:28 PM, Daniel Seagraves <dseagrav () humancapitaldev com> wrote:On Feb 4, 2011, at 3:51 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:How many addresses do I have to be using for it to count as in use? How high will that number go in the next few months/years?The most important thing to ensure "usage" is recognized is that the entire address space is announced plus routed, at least one valid host exists, reverse DNS servers are live, AND ensure that all contact details in the WHOIS database are present, accurate,and up to date; including phone numbers, postal address, and e-mails for the organization contacts. You might look into the option of signing the Legacy RSA: https://www.arin.net/resources/legacy/ Available until Dec 2011; If your allocation predated ARIN.
I gather that if you're considering signing an LRSA, you might want to take *technically competent* legal advice first. Cheers, -- jra
Current thread:
- Post-Exhaustion-phase "punishment" for early adopters Heinrich Strauss (Feb 04)
- Re: Post-Exhaustion-phase "punishment" for early adopters Fred Baker (Feb 04)
- Re: Post-Exhaustion-phase "punishment" for early adopters Benson Schliesser (Feb 04)
- Re: Post-Exhaustion-phase "punishment" for early adopters Bill Woodcock (Feb 04)
- Re: Post-Exhaustion-phase "punishment" for early adopters Daniel Seagraves (Feb 04)
- Re: Post-Exhaustion-phase "punishment" for early adopters Patrick W. Gilmore (Feb 04)
- Re: Post-Exhaustion-phase "punishment" for early adopters Jared Mauch (Feb 04)
- Re: Post-Exhaustion-phase "punishment" for early adopters Patrick W. Gilmore (Feb 04)
- Re: Post-Exhaustion-phase "punishment" for early adopters Daniel Seagraves (Feb 04)
- Re: Post-Exhaustion-phase "punishment" for early adopters Jimmy Hess (Feb 04)
- Re: Post-Exhaustion-phase "punishment" for early adopters Jay Ashworth (Feb 04)
- RE: Post-Exhaustion-phase "punishment" for early adopters Lee Howard (Feb 06)
- Re: Post-Exhaustion-phase "punishment" for early adopters Owen DeLong (Feb 04)
- Re: Post-Exhaustion-phase "punishment" for early adopters Daniel Seagraves (Feb 04)
- Re: Post-Exhaustion-phase "punishment" for early adopters Fred Baker (Feb 04)
- Re: Post-Exhaustion-phase "punishment" for early adopters Ralph J.Mayer (Feb 05)
- Re: Post-Exhaustion-phase "punishment" for early adopters Bill Woodcock (Feb 04)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Post-Exhaustion-phase "punishment" for early adopters Brandon Butterworth (Feb 04)
- Re: Post-Exhaustion-phase "punishment" for early adopters gb10hkzo-nanog (Feb 08)
- Re: Post-Exhaustion-phase "punishment" for early adopters Jared Mauch (Feb 08)
- Re: Post-Exhaustion-phase "punishment" for early adopters Sam Stickland (Feb 08)
- Re: Post-Exhaustion-phase "punishment" for early adopters Matthew Kaufman (Feb 08)