nanog mailing list archives
RE: Another v6 question
From: "George Bonser" <gbonser () seven com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 11:44:01 -0800
From: Max Pierson Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2011 10:20 AM To: nanog group Subject: Another v6 questionFrom the provider perspective, what is the prefix-length that most
are
accepting to be injected into your tables?? 2 or so years ago, I read where someone stated that they were told by ATT that they weren't planning
on
accepting anything smaller than a /32. So what if I get my shiny new /48 from ARIN and am already multi-homed??? Does ATT not want my business (which they wouldn't get if the first place, but for argument sake, yes, I chose to pick on ATT, sorry if I offended anyone :) I already see /40's /48's ,etc in the v6 table, so some folks are allowing /48 and smaller, so what
is
the new /24 in v6?
Generally, a /48 from PI space and a /32 from PA space will be accepted. If you were issued a /48 from ARIN it will generally be accepted. Some accept all the way out to a /64. I do see some de-aggregated /64 nets I am currently filtering but since the path is the same as the /32, I haven't seen need to open those filters up yet. Can't figure out why those are de-aggregated either as I don't see the more specific announced anywhere else.
Current thread:
- Re: Another v6 question, (continued)
- Re: Another v6 question Owen DeLong (Jan 27)
- /64 is "enough" until 2021 for 90% of users (was Re: Another v6 question) Jared Mauch (Jan 27)
- Re: /64 is "enough" until 2021 for 90% of users (was Re: Another v6 question) Mark Smith (Jan 30)
- Re: Another v6 question Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 27)
- Re: Another v6 question Mikael Abrahamsson (Jan 27)
- Re: Another v6 question Owen DeLong (Jan 27)
- Re: Another v6 question Per Carlson (Jan 28)
- Re: Another v6 question Mark Andrews (Jan 28)
- Re: Another v6 question Jimmy Hess (Jan 27)
- Re: Another v6 question Jack Bates (Jan 27)