nanog mailing list archives

Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you?


From: Jack Bates <jbates () brightok net>
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 13:41:04 -0600

On 1/13/2011 1:35 PM, Michael Ruiz wrote:
For example a M-series is always going to cost some
bucks after you factor the FPC and the PICS that need to be loaded.

I find this usually has to do with the fact that there is no "backup to software processing" on a Juniper. Every feature it supports, it does so in hardware. If the hardware won't do it, then JUNOS won't do it.

The exception has been the multiservices PIC, which is being obsoleted with the trio chipset.

You are right, though. If you don't need the performance, you can settle for a cisco in many cases. Also, the MX Juniper line often has nicer performance than the M series if you do more ethernet than sonet.

Jack


Current thread: