nanog mailing list archives
RE: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you?
From: Thomas Magill <tmagill () providecommerce com>
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 00:48:26 +0000
The problem is, it doesn't seem to support an automated rollback function. You'd need OOB to get access in many cases to do the rollback.
I thought that is what 'configure terminal revert timer x' did. It looks like you have to do a 'configure confirm' before the revert time expires or it reverts back to when you started. Maybe I'll actually try this out and find out for sure.
Current thread:
- Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you?, (continued)
- Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Michael Ruiz (Jan 13)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Chris Adams (Jan 13)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Greg Whynott (Jan 13)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Jack Bates (Jan 13)
- RE: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Michael Ruiz (Jan 13)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Jack Bates (Jan 13)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Scott Morris (Jan 13)
- RE: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Thomas Magill (Jan 13)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Bill Blackford (Jan 13)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Jack Bates (Jan 13)
- RE: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Thomas Magill (Jan 13)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Chris Adams (Jan 13)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Owen DeLong (Jan 13)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Jack Bates (Jan 13)
- RE: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Michael Ruiz (Jan 13)
- Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Michael Ruiz (Jan 13)
- RE: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Justin M. Streiner (Jan 13)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Leo Bicknell (Jan 13)
- RE: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Michael Ruiz (Jan 13)