nanog mailing list archives
Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you?
From: b nickell <nickellman () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 15:13:38 -0700
Cheers.. to M.A.R.'s related view On Jan 13, 2011 12:37 PM, "Michael Ruiz" <mruiz () lstfinancial com> wrote: I know where I have worked we have had a mixture of Juniper and Cisco equipment. Personally buying a Juniper Router like a M or a T series is like buying a Ferrari. I like Cisco personally and they are cheaper than buying a Juniper. For example a M-series is always going to cost some bucks after you factor the FPC and the PICS that need to be loaded. Personally I like the JUNOS system better than the Cisco IOS, it is more tech friendly when troubleshooting issues. I have not worked on the new IOS-NX system, but if I understand it correctly it is modular. If Cisco can the really cool Monitor command and the structure the command tree like a Juniper. I would think Cisco did something totally right. M.A.R
Current thread:
- RE: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you?, (continued)
- RE: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Thomas Magill (Jan 13)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Bill Blackford (Jan 13)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Jack Bates (Jan 13)
- RE: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Thomas Magill (Jan 13)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Owen DeLong (Jan 13)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Jack Bates (Jan 13)
- RE: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Michael Ruiz (Jan 13)
- RE: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Justin M. Streiner (Jan 13)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Leo Bicknell (Jan 13)
- RE: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Michael Ruiz (Jan 13)