nanog mailing list archives

Re: Request Spamhaus contact


From: William Pitcock <nenolod () systeminplace net>
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 17:31:59 -0600

Hi,

On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 17:09:07 -0500
Jeffrey Lyon <jeffrey.lyon () blacklotus net> wrote:

That's fine, but the listings don't even make sense. There is no
evidence in the listing and i'm still trying to figure out a) why they
think that these new listings have anything to do with the ones we
already cleaned and b) which customers actually need to be removed and
for specifically what reasons. Their entire mentality is "the site is
pharmacy which means its part of a criminal spammer gang," regardless
of whether or not that is true.


Please stop pretending that you're not hosting e-trash.  208.64.122.114
is still hosting an active SEO poisoning site (myspace-codes.com).  I
think, frankly, it would make your life a lot simpler if you just
accepted the fact that BlackLotus sells to e-trash, just like the rest
of the "ddos-protected hosting solutions" companies do.

My initial reply to sbl-removals@ was rather civil, my second reply
not so much. At this point I just need them to check their e-mail and
answer a few questions. I need intelligence to work with if they
expect me to cooperate with them. I have no problem removing customers
that need to be removed but I need to have all of the details to act
on the request.

You have all the intelligence you need.  You host e-trash script
kiddies and SEO poisoners.  Just go get some wirecutters and snip the
wires coming out of that busted up 6509 you used to tout on WHT and the
problem will be solved.

I have a slogan by the way, "Blacklotus AKA The IRC Company - making
EFnet more trashy since FooNet got raided".

William


Current thread: