nanog mailing list archives
Re: Request Spamhaus contact
From: Patrick Giagnocavo <patrick () zill net>
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 20:32:17 -0500
On 1/17/2011 7:11 PM, Jeffrey Lyon wrote:
William, You're quite right, we don't. We presume that our customers are honorable until proven otherwise. We're a legitimate U.S. based corporation and we make ourselves available to the pertinent RBL's and authorities as appropriate. We take action where action needs to be taken.
I don't have a "dog in this fight" but could I point out, that somehow SpamHaus was able to determine more about what was going on in your network, than you were? Perhaps that should indicate to you (at the least) that you need to invest a little more in your monitoring infrastructure. Cordially Patrick
Current thread:
- Re: Request Spamhaus contact, (continued)
- Re: Request Spamhaus contact Jeffrey Lyon (Jan 17)
- Re: Request Spamhaus contact William Pitcock (Jan 17)
- Re: Request Spamhaus contact Jeffrey Lyon (Jan 17)
- Re: Request Spamhaus contact William Pitcock (Jan 17)
- Re: Request Spamhaus contact Jeffrey Lyon (Jan 17)
- Re: Request Spamhaus contact William Pitcock (Jan 17)
- Re: Request Spamhaus contact Jeffrey Lyon (Jan 17)
- Re: Request Spamhaus contact William Pitcock (Jan 17)
- Re: Request Spamhaus contact Andrew Kirch (Jan 17)
- Re: Request Spamhaus contact Nathan Stratton (Jan 17)
- Re: Request Spamhaus contact Patrick Giagnocavo (Jan 17)
- Re: Request Spamhaus contact Raymond Dijkxhoorn (Jan 17)
- Re: Request Spamhaus contact Jeffrey Lyon (Jan 17)
- Re: Request Spamhaus contact Raymond Dijkxhoorn (Jan 17)
- Re: Request Spamhaus contact TR Shaw (Jan 17)
- [***** SPAM 5.8 *****] Re: Request Spamhaus contact ML (Jan 17)
- Re: Request Spamhaus contact Jeroen van Aart (Jan 17)