nanog mailing list archives

Re: NANOG List Update - Moving Forward


From: "Ben Carleton" <ben () bencarleton com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 12:25:21 -0400 (EDT)

Right, you should, because we are back on s0 (server zero?) and mailman. The headers were being suppressed by the AMSL 
servers, which are running that strange "bulk_mailer 1.13" software. If you inspect the headers for any of the messages 
that were forwarded to us from that server (the one that started the thread called "NANOG List Update - Moving Forward" 
from Michael K Smith, for example), you will see that the headers are being stripped...

--bc

-----Original Message-----
From: "Jay Ashworth" <jra () baylink com>
Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2011 12:13pm
To: "NANOG" <nanog () nanog org>
Subject: Re: NANOG List Update - Moving Forward

----- Original Message -----
From: "Ben Carleton" <ben () bencarleton com>

* The mailing list is stripping out all Received: headers from prior
to the message hitting the listserver

You're the third person to report that, but *I* am seeing incoming Received
headers in my messages here -- yours, for example, has them all, even prior
to the message hitting s0.

Great name, there, BTW.  "s0".

Cheers,
-- jra
-- 
Jay R. Ashworth                  Baylink                       jra () baylink com
Designer                     The Things I Think                       RFC 2100
Ashworth & Associates     http://baylink.pitas.com         2000 Land Rover DII
St Petersburg FL USA      http://photo.imageinc.us             +1 727 647 1274





Current thread: