nanog mailing list archives
Re: ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs
From: "John Levine" <johnl () iecc com>
Date: 18 Jun 2011 04:13:29 -0000
so did anyone have a question or is my epistolary stylistic genius sufficient as topic of general interest?
Hi. How does ICANN seem to be reacting to the flaming arrow that the DOC shot in front of them? Also, the DOC letter refers to a European Commission letter from Tuesday, which I can't find on ICANN's web site or anywhere else. Anyone in Singapore know about it? R's, John
Current thread:
- Re: ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs, (continued)
- Re: ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs Jay Ashworth (Jun 17)
- Re: ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs Owen DeLong (Jun 18)
- Re: ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs Robert Bonomi (Jun 18)
- Re: ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs John Levine (Jun 17)
- Re: ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs Robert Bonomi (Jun 18)
- Re: ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs Owen DeLong (Jun 18)
- Re: ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs Mark Andrews (Jun 18)
- Re: ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs Owen DeLong (Jun 18)
- Re: ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs Jay Ashworth (Jun 17)
- Re: ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs John Levine (Jun 17)
- Re: ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs Jay Ashworth (Jun 19)
- Re: ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs Joly MacFie (Jun 19)
- Re: ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs Paul Vixie (Jun 19)
- Re: ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs Mark Andrews (Jun 19)
- Re: ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs Jaap Akkerhuis (Jun 20)
- Re: ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs Mark Andrews (Jun 20)
- Re: ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs Jaap Akkerhuis (Jun 20)