nanog mailing list archives
Re: v6 proof of life
From: Jared Mauch <jared () puck nether net>
Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 23:50:37 -0400
On Jun 6, 2011, at 11:47 PM, Wes Hardaker wrote:
On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 23:56:32 +0000, Paul Vixie <vixie () isc org> said:PV> it's been a while since i looked at the query stream still hitting PV> importantly and happily, there's a great deal of IPv6 happening PV> here. Which is reaffirming what many have said for a while: it'll be the server-to-server traffic that will first peak. It's just going to take the client-server relationships years to catch up. Every time I look at my maillogs I've found there is quite a bit of v6 happening. But the web logs show almost nothing.
There was some additional research done by Geoff Houston indicating that if you exposed tunnel capable hosts (that were able to reach IPv6 literals) you had something closer to 20% IPv6 connectivity. I'm already excited about traffic levels and patterns in less than 24 hours. Will be interesting to observe. - Jared See if you can reach this even if you don't have native IPv6… http://[2001:418:3f4::5]/
Current thread:
- v6 proof of life Paul Vixie (Jun 06)
- Re: v6 proof of life Wes Hardaker (Jun 06)
- Re: v6 proof of life Jared Mauch (Jun 06)
- RE: v6 proof of life George Bonser (Jun 06)
- Re: v6 proof of life Arturo Servin (Jun 07)
- Re: v6 proof of life Jared Mauch (Jun 06)
- Message not available
- Re: v6 proof of life Tim Chown (Jun 07)
- Re: v6 proof of life Wes Hardaker (Jun 06)
- Re: v6 proof of life Jima (Jun 07)
- Re: v6 proof of life Paul Vixie (Jun 07)