nanog mailing list archives
RE: Consequences of BGP Peering with Private Addresses
From: Leigh Porter <leigh.porter () ukbroadband com>
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 11:30:35 +0000
________________________________________ From: Jeff Wheeler [jsw () inconcepts biz]
This may sound crazy, and it is certainly not an ideal way of doing things; but it is an alternative worth consideration as networks exhaust their available IPv4.
I have not followed this whole thread, but did anybody suggest just using IPv6 for this? -- Leigh Porter ______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email ______________________________________________________________________
Current thread:
- Consequences of BGP Peering with Private Addresses James Grace (Jun 15)
- Re: Consequences of BGP Peering with Private Addresses Patrick W. Gilmore (Jun 15)
- Re: Consequences of BGP Peering with Private Addresses isabel dias (Jun 15)
- Re: Consequences of BGP Peering with Private Addresses Nick Hilliard (Jun 15)
- Re: Consequences of BGP Peering with Private Addresses Cameron Byrne (Jun 15)
- Re: Consequences of BGP Peering with Private Addresses isabel dias (Jun 15)
- Re: Consequences of BGP Peering with Private Addresses Jeff Wheeler (Jun 16)
- RE: Consequences of BGP Peering with Private Addresses Leigh Porter (Jun 16)
- RE: Consequences of BGP Peering with Private Addresses Tom Hill (Jun 16)
- RE: Consequences of BGP Peering with Private Addresses Leigh Porter (Jun 16)
- RE: Consequences of BGP Peering with Private Addresses Leigh Porter (Jun 16)
- Re: Consequences of BGP Peering with Private Addresses Adam Rothschild (Jun 16)
- Re: Consequences of BGP Peering with Private Addresses Patrick W. Gilmore (Jun 15)
- Re: Consequences of BGP Peering with Private Addresses Gaurab Raj Upadhaya (Jun 16)
- Re: Consequences of BGP Peering with Private Addresses Dobbins, Roland (Jun 21)