nanog mailing list archives

Re: Consequences of BGP Peering with Private Addresses

From: Adam Rothschild <asr () latency net>
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 09:33:32 -0400

Also absent from this discussion is that the RIRs are still issuing
address space, and interface addressing is perfectly reasonable
justification.

-a

Current thread:

Consequences of BGP Peering with Private Addresses James Grace (Jun 15)
- Re: Consequences of BGP Peering with Private Addresses Patrick W. Gilmore (Jun 15)
  - Re: Consequences of BGP Peering with Private Addresses isabel dias (Jun 15)
- Re: Consequences of BGP Peering with Private Addresses Nick Hilliard (Jun 15)
- Re: Consequences of BGP Peering with Private Addresses Cameron Byrne (Jun 15)
- Re: Consequences of BGP Peering with Private Addresses isabel dias (Jun 15)
- Re: Consequences of BGP Peering with Private Addresses Jeff Wheeler (Jun 16)
  - RE: Consequences of BGP Peering with Private Addresses Leigh Porter (Jun 16)
    - RE: Consequences of BGP Peering with Private Addresses Tom Hill (Jun 16)
    - RE: Consequences of BGP Peering with Private Addresses Leigh Porter (Jun 16)
  - Re: Consequences of BGP Peering with Private Addresses Adam Rothschild (Jun 16)
- Re: Consequences of BGP Peering with Private Addresses Gaurab Raj Upadhaya (Jun 16)
- Re: Consequences of BGP Peering with Private Addresses Dobbins, Roland (Jun 21)