nanog mailing list archives
Re: Real World NAT64 deployments
From: Elliot Finley <efinley.lists () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2011 16:33:03 -0700
Ok, apparently there is NAT64 and there is NAT64. I don't believe the poster was talking about a v6 load balancer VIP with v4 servers. I think the OP is talking about the NAT64 portion of NAT64/DNS64 where native v6 source and destination IPs are NATed to v4 destination and source IPs for communicating with v4 resources from a v6 host. But I might be projecting my own needs here. So, what kind of NAT64 are we talking about? George
You are correct. I'm talking about the NAT64 portion of NAT64/DNS64. Elliot
Current thread:
- Re: Real World NAT64 deployments, (continued)
- Re: Real World NAT64 deployments Randy Bush (Mar 04)
- Re: Real World NAT64 deployments JORDI PALET MARTINEZ (Mar 04)
- Re: Real World NAT64 deployments William Herrin (Mar 03)
- Re: Real World NAT64 deployments Mark Andrews (Mar 03)
- RE: Real World NAT64 deployments Frank Bulk (Mar 03)
- Re: Real World NAT64 deployments sthaug (Mar 03)
- Re: Real World NAT64 deployments Owen DeLong (Mar 03)
- Re: Real World NAT64 deployments Owen DeLong (Mar 03)
- Re: Real World NAT64 deployments Elliot Finley (Mar 03)
- Re: Real World NAT64 deployments Tom Hill (Mar 04)
- Re: Real World NAT64 deployments Francois Tigeot (Mar 04)
- Re: Real World NAT64 deployments Simon Perreault (Mar 04)
- Re: Real World NAT64 deployments Bjoern A. Zeeb (Mar 04)
- Re: Real World NAT64 deployments Leo Bicknell (Mar 03)
- Re: Real World NAT64 deployments Karl Auer (Mar 03)
- Re: Real World NAT64 deployments Owen DeLong (Mar 03)