nanog mailing list archives
Re: Real World NAT64 deployments
From: Tom Hill <tom () ninjabadger net>
Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2011 08:59:03 +0000
On Thu, 2011-03-03 at 16:33 -0700, Elliot Finley wrote:
You are correct. I'm talking about the NAT64 portion of NAT64/DNS64. Elliot
Andrews & Arnold (http://aaisp.net.uk) have a NAT64 gateway which is operated by a Firebrick 6202, IIRC. As an ISP this is really for a handful of IPv6-only customers, but it seems to be working well. I've been considering the smaller Firebrick models (2700/2500) to do something similar for IPv6-only connectivity to an army of older Parallels Plesk installations, which of course Parallels has zero intention of bringing up to date. (Plesk 10.2 'preview' is floating about with IPv6 support -- it'll likely take them another 3-4 releases before any of it works properly, based on their performance to date.) Tom
Current thread:
- Re: Real World NAT64 deployments, (continued)
- Re: Real World NAT64 deployments JORDI PALET MARTINEZ (Mar 04)
- Re: Real World NAT64 deployments William Herrin (Mar 03)
- Re: Real World NAT64 deployments Mark Andrews (Mar 03)
- RE: Real World NAT64 deployments Frank Bulk (Mar 03)
- Re: Real World NAT64 deployments sthaug (Mar 03)
- Re: Real World NAT64 deployments Owen DeLong (Mar 03)
- Re: Real World NAT64 deployments Owen DeLong (Mar 03)
- Re: Real World NAT64 deployments Elliot Finley (Mar 03)
- Re: Real World NAT64 deployments Tom Hill (Mar 04)
- Re: Real World NAT64 deployments Francois Tigeot (Mar 04)
- Re: Real World NAT64 deployments Simon Perreault (Mar 04)
- Re: Real World NAT64 deployments Bjoern A. Zeeb (Mar 04)
- Re: Real World NAT64 deployments Leo Bicknell (Mar 03)
- Re: Real World NAT64 deployments Karl Auer (Mar 03)
- Re: Real World NAT64 deployments Owen DeLong (Mar 03)
- Re: Real World NAT64 deployments TJ (Mar 04)