nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 SEO implecations?
From: TR Shaw <tshaw () oitc com>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 19:21:43 -0400
On Mar 28, 2011, at 7:17 PM, Nathan Eisenberg wrote:
Why is native IPv6 needed? I'd have thought a tunnel would be fine, too.I believe the concern is that the higher latency of a tunnel would impact SEO rankings.
True but you live with what you can get acces to ;-) Tom
Current thread:
- IPv6 SEO implecations? Wil Schultz (Mar 28)
- Re: IPv6 SEO implecations? William Pitcock (Mar 28)
- Re: IPv6 SEO implecations? Owen DeLong (Mar 28)
- Re: IPv6 SEO implecations? Karl Auer (Mar 28)
- RE: IPv6 SEO implecations? Nathan Eisenberg (Mar 28)
- Re: IPv6 SEO implecations? TR Shaw (Mar 28)
- Re: IPv6 SEO implecations? TR Shaw (Mar 28)
- Re: IPv6 SEO implecations? Owen DeLong (Mar 28)
- Re: IPv6 SEO implecations? Karl Auer (Mar 28)
- Re: IPv6 SEO implecations? Owen DeLong (Mar 28)
- Re: IPv6 SEO implecations? Wil Schultz (Mar 28)
- Re: IPv6 SEO implecations? Nicholas Meredith (Mar 28)
- RE: IPv6 SEO implecations? Nathan Eisenberg (Mar 28)
- Re: IPv6 SEO implecations? Nicholas Meredith (Mar 28)
- Re: IPv6 SEO implecations? Fred Baker (Mar 28)
- Re: IPv6 SEO implecations? Ryan Rawdon (Mar 28)