nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 SEO implecations?
From: Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 18:07:47 -0700
On Mar 28, 2011, at 4:10 PM, Karl Auer wrote:
On Mon, 2011-03-28 at 15:55 -0700, Owen DeLong wrote:If you're worried about SEO, go with native IPv6 and then deploy AAAAs for WWW.domain.foo.Why is native IPv6 needed? I'd have thought a tunnel would be fine, too.
He was worried about the latency of tunnels creating penalties for SEO purposes, but, otherwise, yes, that works too. Since he stated a desire to avoid tunnels as an initial area of concern, I went with his original statement. Owen
Current thread:
- IPv6 SEO implecations? Wil Schultz (Mar 28)
- Re: IPv6 SEO implecations? William Pitcock (Mar 28)
- Re: IPv6 SEO implecations? Owen DeLong (Mar 28)
- Re: IPv6 SEO implecations? Karl Auer (Mar 28)
- RE: IPv6 SEO implecations? Nathan Eisenberg (Mar 28)
- Re: IPv6 SEO implecations? TR Shaw (Mar 28)
- Re: IPv6 SEO implecations? TR Shaw (Mar 28)
- Re: IPv6 SEO implecations? Owen DeLong (Mar 28)
- Re: IPv6 SEO implecations? Karl Auer (Mar 28)
- Re: IPv6 SEO implecations? Owen DeLong (Mar 28)
- Re: IPv6 SEO implecations? Wil Schultz (Mar 28)
- Re: IPv6 SEO implecations? Nicholas Meredith (Mar 28)
- RE: IPv6 SEO implecations? Nathan Eisenberg (Mar 28)
- Re: IPv6 SEO implecations? Nicholas Meredith (Mar 28)
- Re: IPv6 SEO implecations? Fred Baker (Mar 28)
- Re: IPv6 SEO implecations? Ryan Rawdon (Mar 28)
- Re: IPv6 SEO implecations? Wil Schultz (Mar 29)