nanog mailing list archives
Re: Yahoo and IPv6
From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch () muada com>
Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 10:56:34 +0200
On 16 mei 2011, at 9:31, Owen DeLong wrote:
I believe that the BitTorrent clients are smart enough to discard the IPv4 nodes reached through NAT64 and will, instead, just use the native IPv6 nodes. I don't see this as a problem and I"m not sure why you do.
Because that way the IPv4 and IPv6 swarms remain disconnected in the absence of some dual stack peers. (I.e., if the swarm is small and you're the only IPv6 participant.) It would be much better if you could go from IPv6 to IPv4 through a NAT64.
Current thread:
- Re: Yahoo and IPv6, (continued)
- Re: Yahoo and IPv6 Matthew Kaufman (May 14)
- Re: Yahoo and IPv6 Cameron Byrne (May 15)
- Re: Yahoo and IPv6 Matthew Kaufman (May 15)
- Re: Yahoo and IPv6 Cameron Byrne (May 15)
- Re: Yahoo and IPv6 Jima (May 15)
- Re: Yahoo and IPv6 Iljitsch van Beijnum (May 15)
- Re: Yahoo and IPv6 Owen DeLong (May 15)
- Re: Yahoo and IPv6 Matthew Kaufman (May 15)
- RE: Yahoo and IPv6 George Bonser (May 15)
- Re: Yahoo and IPv6 Owen DeLong (May 16)
- Re: Yahoo and IPv6 Iljitsch van Beijnum (May 16)
- RE: Yahoo and IPv6 George Bonser (May 16)
- Re: Yahoo and IPv6 Owen DeLong (May 16)
- RE: Yahoo and IPv6 Dan Wing (May 16)
- Re: Yahoo and IPv6 Owen DeLong (May 16)
- Re: Yahoo and IPv6 Arturo Servin (May 16)
- Re: Yahoo and IPv6 Owen DeLong (May 15)
- Re: Yahoo and IPv6 Iljitsch van Beijnum (May 15)
- Re: Yahoo and IPv6 Iljitsch van Beijnum (May 10)
- Banks and IPv6 (was Re: Yahoo and IPv6) Jared Mauch (May 10)
- Re: Yahoo and IPv6 Igor Gashinsky (May 10)