nanog mailing list archives
RE: Outgoing SMTP Servers
From: "Tim" <timphp () progressivemarketingnetwork com>
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 02:33:02 -0600
This sadly is very common. It is getting more common by the day it seems but this practice has started almost a decade ago. An easy work around is to use a custom port as they seem to just block port 25 as a bad port but leave just about everything else open including 2525 which seems to be a common secondary smtp port for hosting companies.
Current thread:
- RE: Outgoing SMTP Servers, (continued)
- Message not available
- RE: Outgoing SMTP Servers Brian Johnson (Oct 28)
- Re: Outgoing SMTP Servers Owen DeLong (Oct 28)
- Re: Outgoing SMTP Servers Bill Stewart (Oct 28)
- RE: Outgoing SMTP Servers Brian Johnson (Oct 31)
- Re: Outgoing SMTP Servers Brian Johnson (Oct 28)
- Re: Outgoing SMTP Servers William Herrin (Oct 28)
- Re: Outgoing SMTP Servers Mike Jones (Oct 28)
- Re: Outgoing SMTP Servers Brian Johnson (Oct 28)
- RE: Outgoing SMTP Servers McCall, Gabriel (Oct 28)
- Re: Outgoing SMTP Servers Jay Ashworth (Oct 30)
- Re: Outgoing SMTP Servers Leigh Porter (Oct 26)
- Re: Outgoing SMTP Servers J (Oct 25)
- Re: Outgoing SMTP Servers Blake Hudson (Oct 25)
- Re: Outgoing SMTP Servers Graham Beneke (Oct 25)