RE: NAT444 or ?

["Dan Wing" <dwing () cisco com>]

...
> The striking thing I picked up is that NTT considers the CGN equipment
> a big black hole where money goes into. Because it won't solve their
> problem now or in the future and it becomes effectively a piece of
> equipment they need to buy and then scrap "soon" after.

It would get scrapped when all servers support dual stack.  What year
is that predicted to occur?

> They acknowledge the need, but they'd rather not buy one.
> That and they (the isp) get called for anything which doesn't work.

-d