nanog mailing list archives
Re: NAT444 or ?
From: Mark Tinka <mtinka () globaltransit net>
Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2011 13:46:30 +0800
On Thursday, September 08, 2011 01:41:58 PM Seth Mos wrote:
The striking thing I picked up is that NTT considers the CGN equipment a big black hole where money goes into. Because it won't solve their problem now or in the future and it becomes effectively a piece of equipment they need to buy and then scrap "soon" after. They acknowledge the need, but they'd rather not buy one. That and they (the isp) get called for anything which doesn't work.
In spending millions of hard-earned $$ toward vendors, NTT might not be alone in this realization. However, in acknowledging that it's an endless blackhole where you won't see money necessarily coming back relative to the amount being put in, they may just part of a small handful of folk, sadly. GPRS/3G/EDGE has made many a mobile provider especially notorious. Mark.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Current thread:
- RE: NAT444 or ?, (continued)
- RE: NAT444 or ? Leigh Porter (Sep 07)
- Re: NAT444 or ? Randy Bush (Sep 07)
- RE: NAT444 or ? Leigh Porter (Sep 07)
- Re: NAT444 or ? Daniel Roesen (Sep 07)
- RE: NAT444 or ? Leigh Porter (Sep 07)
- Re: NAT444 or ? Geoff Huston (Sep 07)
- Re: NAT444 or ? Seth Mos (Sep 07)
- RE: NAT444 or ? Leigh Porter (Sep 08)
- Re: NAT444 or ? Mark Tinka (Sep 09)
- RE: NAT444 or ? Dan Wing (Sep 08)
- Re: NAT444 or ? Mark Tinka (Sep 09)
- Re: NAT444 or ? Dobbins, Roland (Sep 09)
- Re: NAT444 or ? Mark Tinka (Sep 09)
- Re: NAT444 or ? Dobbins, Roland (Sep 09)
- RE: NAT444 or ? Leigh Porter (Sep 07)
- Re: NAT444 or ? Cameron Byrne (Sep 10)
- RE: NAT444 or ? Leigh Porter (Sep 11)
- Re: NAT444 or ? Dobbins, Roland (Sep 11)
- Re: NAT444 or ? Cameron Byrne (Sep 11)
- RE: NAT444 or ? Dan Wing (Sep 08)
- Re: NAT444 or ? Jean-Francois . TremblayING (Sep 07)
- Re: NAT444 or ? Daniel Roesen (Sep 07)