nanog mailing list archives
Re: Nxdomain redirect revenue
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 09:27:00 -0400
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 7:50 AM, Jimmy Hess <mysidia () gmail com> wrote:
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 3:57 AM, William Allen Simpson <william.allen.simpson () gmail com> wrote: [snip]Certainly, hijacking google.com NS records to JOMAX.NET would be a criminal interference. After all, that's all DNSsec signed now, isn't it?I would rather see DNSSEC and TLS/HTTPS get implemented end to end.
how does tls/https help here? if you get sent to the 'wrong host' whether or not it does https/tls is irrelevant, no? (save the case of chrome and domain pinning)
The solution is to spread their name as widely as possible, so consumers can make an informed choice if they wish to avoid service providers that engage in abusive practices, and bring it attention to regulators if the service providers are acting as an abusive monopoly in regards to their interception practices.
sadly, not everyone has a choice in providers :(
Current thread:
- Re: Nxdomain redirect revenue, (continued)
- Re: Nxdomain redirect revenue Jimmy Hess (Sep 25)
- Re: Nxdomain redirect revenue Alexander Harrowell (Sep 26)
- Re: Nxdomain redirect revenue Florian Weimer (Sep 26)
- Re: Nxdomain redirect revenue Cameron Byrne (Sep 26)
- Re: Nxdomain redirect revenue Christopher Morrow (Sep 26)
- Re: Nxdomain redirect revenue Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 26)
- Re: Nxdomain redirect revenue Christopher Morrow (Sep 26)
- Re: Nxdomain redirect revenue Christopher Morrow (Sep 26)
- Re: Nxdomain redirect revenue Cameron Byrne (Sep 26)
- Re: Nxdomain redirect revenue Jimmy Hess (Sep 27)
- Re: Nxdomain redirect revenue Christopher Morrow (Sep 27)
- Re: Nxdomain redirect revenue Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 27)
- Re: Nxdomain redirect revenue Christopher Morrow (Sep 27)