nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 End User Fee
From: Jimmy Hess <mysidia () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2012 21:08:17 -0500
On 8/3/12, Otis L. Surratt, Jr. <otis () ocosa com> wrote:
Anyone charging end users for IPv6 space yet? :p
ISPs already charge for bandwidth link capacity. Why charge a fee to discourage subscribers from adopting a protocol that will let the ISP sell larger capacity links? IPv6 packet headers are 40 bytes length, Versus IPv4 headers which were ~20 bytes. -- -JH
Current thread:
- RE: IPv6 End User Fee, (continued)
- RE: IPv6 End User Fee Otis L. Surratt, Jr. (Aug 03)
- Re: IPv6 End User Fee William Pitcock (Aug 03)
- Re: IPv6 End User Fee Cutler James R (Aug 03)
- RE: IPv6 End User Fee Otis L. Surratt, Jr. (Aug 03)
- Re: IPv6 End User Fee Owen DeLong (Aug 03)
- RE: IPv6 End User Fee Otis L. Surratt, Jr. (Aug 03)
- Re: IPv6 End User Fee Derek Ivey (Aug 03)
- Re: IPv6 End User Fee George Herbert (Aug 03)
- Re: IPv6 End User Fee Seth Mattinen (Aug 03)
- Re: IPv6 End User Fee Randy Bush (Aug 03)
- Re: IPv6 End User Fee Owen DeLong (Aug 03)
- Re: IPv6 End User Fee Eugen Leitl (Aug 04)
- Re: IPv6 End User Fee Jimmy Hess (Aug 04)
- Re: IPv6 End User Fee Eugen Leitl (Aug 04)
- Re: IPv6 End User Fee Owen DeLong (Aug 04)
- Re: IPv6 End User Fee Eugen Leitl (Aug 04)
- Re: IPv6 End User Fee Owen DeLong (Aug 04)
- Re: IPv6 End User Fee Eugen Leitl (Aug 05)