nanog mailing list archives
Re: Six Strike Rule (Was: William was raided...)
From: Joly MacFie <joly () punkcast com>
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2012 14:13:23 -0500
ISOC-NY ran a half day conflab on 6 strikes (which incidentally - and for reasons that escape me - is a name the Copyright Alert System perpetrators wish would not be used) last November 15. A full archive is available at http://isoc-ny.org/p2/4527 On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 12:10 PM, Jason Baugher <jason () thebaughers com>wrote:
We don't do content inspection. We don't really want to know what our customers are doing, and even if we did, there's not enough time in the day to spend paying attention. When we get complaints from the various copyright agencies, we warn the customer to stop. When we hit a certain number of complaints, its bye-bye customer. On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Jeroen Massar <jeroen () unfix org> wrote:On 2012-12-04 11:51, Nick B wrote:In a related note, I wonder if the six-strike rule would violate theISP'ssafe harbor, as it's clearly content inspection.As performed in France, what happens is that some copyright owner contacts the ISP that IP address a.b.c.d had accessed/served copyright infringing data at date/time dd-mm-yyyy HH:mm providing some kind of detail on how they figured that out. That report is a 'strike' and gets forwarded to the user. If that then happens 6 times they are blocked. The ISP as such does not do any content inspection. It is though assumed that some ISPs simply count bytes and that they do some investigation themselves when you reach a certain bandwidth threshold (it seems to correlate that copyright infringers are downloading a lot more than normal webbrowsing users...) Greets, Jeroen
-- --------------------------------------------------------------- Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast WWWhatsup NYC - http://wwwhatsup.com http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com VP (Admin) - ISOC-NY - http://isoc-ny.org -------------------------------------------------------------- -
Current thread:
- Re: William was raided for running a Tor exit node. Please help if you can., (continued)
- Re: William was raided for running a Tor exit node. Please help if you can. Joakim Aronius (Dec 02)
- Re: William was raided for running a Tor exit node. Please help if Joe Greco (Dec 03)
- Re: William was raided for running a Tor exit node. Please help if Warren Bailey (Dec 03)
- Re: William was raided for running a Tor exit node. Please help if Rich Kulawiec (Dec 03)
- Re: William was raided for running a Tor exit node. Please help if . (Dec 03)
- Re: William was raided for running a Tor exit node. Please help if Jordan Michaels (Dec 04)
- Re: William was raided for running a Tor exit node. Please help if Nick B (Dec 04)
- Re: Six Strike Rule (Was: William was raided...) Jeroen Massar (Dec 04)
- Re: Six Strike Rule (Was: William was raided...) Jason Baugher (Dec 04)
- Re: Six Strike Rule (Was: William was raided...) Joly MacFie (Dec 04)
- Re: Six Strike Rule (Was: William was raided...) Owen DeLong (Dec 04)
- Re: Six Strike Rule (Was: William was raided...) Barry Shein (Dec 05)
- RE: Six Strike Rule (Was: William was raided...) Naslund, Steve (Dec 06)
- Re: William was raided for running a Tor exit node. Please help if Jean-Francois Mezei (Dec 04)
- RE: William was raided for running a Tor exit node. Please help if Brian Johnson (Dec 04)
- Re: William was raided for running a Tor exit node. Please help if Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 04)
- Re: William was raided for running a Tor exit node. Please help if Joe Greco (Dec 04)
- RE: William was raided for running a Tor exit node. Please help if Brian Johnson (Dec 04)
- Re: William was raided for running a Tor exit node. Please help if Joe Greco (Dec 04)
- RE: William was raided for running a Tor exit node. Please help if Brian Johnson (Dec 04)